Reports
- Postponed until December meeting to allow full focus Nov. 18 on Goals & Budget discussion
Discussion Topics
AppSec India Seed.
I would like to set aside $25k for an AppSec India seed. This might need to be extended to a larger amount once actual planning takes place and a venue and size estimated. We would most likely get this back or better, so revenue neutral at worst, profitable at best.
Pros: Core to our mission, only draw down if India chapters get planning. Cons: None.
OWASP Infrastructure Transformation
From Matt Tesuaro's briefing to us earlier this year, I believe we have a lot of technical debt in OWASP's sprawling and basically unmanaged infrastructure. If we don't have a good handle on our information assets, we will lose them. I believe as part of a wider program of works, we need to contract Matt's time as a project where this is his day job for a while, first by taking a full inventory of assets, making a recommendation for rolling all like systems into one, and making recommendations like the MailMan upgrade / migration project.
Pros: Will drive out costs in subsequent years. Will increase the effectiveness of Matt's time to look after only a smaller number of more critical systems. Allows us to do things we can't do today. Cons: will likely cost a bit. I would like to say 2-3 months of Matt's time, which we would need to price out and make sure that we have a clear understanding of achievable outcomes.
Project Summits
I would like to put forward a proposal that could take a fair chunk of change. I would like us to put $25k x 2 to be made available to AppSec EU and AppSec US, to allow a week long project summit, prior to the actual conferences. Projects would bid for some of the cash for travel expenses, where we favor locals with lower costs over far flung remote costs.
I would like us to make it clear that folks can participate in a sponsorship drive for the Project Summit to top up these funds.
Pros: Core to our mission that we work on projects. Cons: Would need to make sure that projects are chosen based upon need or strategic significance to OWASP, such as previous Flagship projects who need a lot of TLC to get back into the good books.
No guests listed.
As the Board consists of individuals from many competing organizations, OWASP and its Board shall abide by all applicable anti-trust and competition laws. To avoid any perceived or actual conflict of interest, or anti-trust concerns under US federal, state, or regulations, only the published agenda shall be discussed or voted upon, or amended as below. If there are any conflicts of interest, Board members are expected to disclose the conflict of interest and must recuse themselves from discussion and voting.
Changes to the agenda — unless otherwise prohibited by anti-trust or competition laws — including adding, altering, or tabling of motions is permitted by following Roberts Rules of Order (RONR 12th Ed) 41:63, which requires an affirmative two-thirds vote.
None listed.
Teleconference Information:
Discussion Topics
AppSec India Seed.
I would like to set aside $25k for an AppSec India seed. This might need to be extended to a larger amount once actual planning takes place and a venue and size estimated. We would most likely get this back or better, so revenue neutral at worst, profitable at best.
Pros: Core to our mission, only draw down if India chapters get planning. Cons: None.
OWASP Infrastructure Transformation
From Matt Tesuaro's briefing to us earlier this year, I believe we have a lot of technical debt in OWASP's sprawling and basically unmanaged infrastructure. If we don't have a good handle on our information assets, we will lose them. I believe as part of a wider program of works, we need to contract Matt's time as a project where this is his day job for a while, first by taking a full inventory of assets, making a recommendation for rolling all like systems into one, and making recommendations like the MailMan upgrade / migration project.
Pros: Will drive out costs in subsequent years. Will increase the effectiveness of Matt's time to look after only a smaller number of more critical systems. Allows us to do things we can't do today. Cons: will likely cost a bit. I would like to say 2-3 months of Matt's time, which we would need to price out and make sure that we have a clear understanding of achievable outcomes.
Project Summits
I would like to put forward a proposal that could take a fair chunk of change. I would like us to put $25k x 2 to be made available to AppSec EU and AppSec US, to allow a week long project summit, prior to the actual conferences. Projects would bid for some of the cash for travel expenses, where we favor locals with lower costs over far flung remote costs.
I would like us to make it clear that folks can participate in a sponsorship drive for the Project Summit to top up these funds.
Pros: Core to our mission that we work on projects. Cons: Would need to make sure that projects are chosen based upon need or strategic significance to OWASP, such as previous Flagship projects who need a lot of TLC to get back into the good books.
All active board proposals are listed here
All active board proposals are listed here
All active board proposals are listed here