Mike McCamon
Does the Interim Executive Director have the same signatory authority as an Executive Director?
Motion: To grant the Interim Executive Director the same signatory authority as an Executive Director (Martin Knobloch motions, Owen Pendlebury seconds)
Vote
Gary Robinson - Yes
Ofer Maor - Yes
Owen Pendlebury - Yes
Richard Greenberg - Yes
Sherif Mansour - Yes
Martin Knobloch - Yes
Chenxi Wang - Yes
Mike - should I proceed with the registered trademark for:
- OWASP
- Open Web Application Security Project
- Global AppSec
- AppSec Days
The proposal is for estimated $60k, budgeting $70k. Includes United States, Europe Union and United Kingdom
Owen - European Union cover UK?
Mike - does not but not after Brexit
Richard - do we need to it all now
Owen - if we do some now and some later, will the price be the same.
Mike - I believe so
Sherif - I believe this proposal to be extremely expensive
Ofer - I did this before and did not cost half the price
Mike - I can submit you the proposal, which includes trademark and logos.
Ofer - the funds to use for search is really not worth because we are not going to change the name
Owen - can we use an European lawyer to get another quote
Mike - I have no problem with that
Sherif - if we remove the search funds, how much will the price go down
Mike - I will have to review
Sherif - what is the timeline
Mike - I feel this is urgent
Motion: to enable the Interim Executive Director to proceed with the registered trademarks effort with a cap of $75k and to look for another lower offer and for lawyers in Europe. Exclude United Kingdom if the cost will not be more to add it later and exclude an extensive search. (Martin Knobloch motions, Owen Pendlebury seconds).
Chenxi Wang - Yes
Gary Robinson - Yes
Ofer Maor - abstain
Owen Pendlebury - Yes
Richard Greenberg - Yes
Sherif Mansour - Yes
Martin Knobloch - Yes
Mike - Direct staff to implement an Attributed Giving policy that restricts donations and membership dues splits to gifts more than $25,000. This policy will, as soon as is practically possible, sunset the practice of allowing membership dues being allocated to chapters and projects.
Reasons why:
- The amount of time staff spends on a $50 donation
- The risk to the US tax laws
Risk - if someone donates $10 to the Top Ten, by tax law you can only spend it on Top 10.
Ofer - I think $25k is too high. I would change the number to $1k to start with.
Richard - the main drive is the amount of overhead for such small amounts
Sherif - I agree with Ofer. I think lower number is the best for sponsors.
Owen - can we do some research to see if a company cares regarding the amount.
Mike - the only issue is if a sponsor declines if the number is too high and does not sponsor.
Richard - does this apply if a Chapter/Project wants to donate.
Mike - no because they are not a legal entity.
Martin - review how many chapters/projects have donate buttons on their page. Also we have to research when there is a project drive and people are thinking they are donating for that certain budget.
Sherif - I believe the buttons all link to the main donating page.
Richard - can review the donation amounts in history, so we can review the cap number.
Martin - I believe we need more input to move forward on this topic.
Ofer - transferring funds among through projects and chapters
Tom - the CPA determined that the chapters and projects are not legal entities, so the donated funds are unrestricted, but that is not a legal answer. I believe it should be $5k and more.
Mike - skip number 4 due to lack of time
Mike - Authorize the Executive Director to execute an agreement with the Marriott Wadman Park hotel in Washington, D.C. for a total fiscal commitment of no more than $430,000 to host Global AppSec DC being held the week of September 9, 2019.
Motion: to approve the execute an agreement with the Marriott Wadman Park Hotel in Washington, DC for Global AppSec DC 2019 being held the week of September 9, 2019.
Vote
Chenxi Wang - Yes
Gary Robinson - Yes
Ofer Maor - Yes
Owen Pendlebury - Yes
Richard - Yes
Sherif Mansour - Yes
Martin Knobloch - Yes
Martin - please review the budget submitted, so we can vote at the next meeting.