AST10 — Cross-Platform Reuse

Severity: Medium
Platforms Affected: All

Description

Skills are increasingly ported across platforms (OpenClaw → Claude Code → Cursor → VS Code) without translating the security properties of the source format. A skill with a permission manifest on one platform is stripped of that manifest on another. Security controls that exist in one ecosystem’s metadata format simply do not exist in another’s — creating exploitable gaps when skills cross platform boundaries.

Why It’s Unique to Skills

MCP standardizes the protocol. AST10 addresses the content security within skills — the fact that there is no universal skill format and no normalization of security metadata when skills are ported. This is not a protocol problem; it is a behavioral abstraction problem.

Real-World Evidence

  • Snyk ToxicSkills confirmed malicious skills published simultaneously on ClawHub and skills.sh by the same threat actors (zaycv, moonshine-100rze), exploiting the fact that neither platform shared scanning intelligence.
  • Snyk’s toxicskills-goof proof-of-concept demonstrates a fake Vercel skill that works across Gemini CLI and OpenClaw — the same malicious SKILL.md is effective on multiple runtimes.
  • The absence of a universal format means organizations managing a multi-platform agent stack cannot apply a single governance policy — each platform requires separate tooling, separate scanning, and separate approval workflows.

Attack Scenarios

Security Property Loss in Translation

A skill with risk_tier: L3 (destructive) is ported to a platform that doesn’t support risk_tier; the warning is silently dropped.

Cross-Registry Arbitrage

Attacker publishes a skill on a lightly-scanned registry (skills.sh) and promotes it to a more-trusted registry, leveraging the install count as a false trust signal.

Multi-Platform Campaign

Same malicious payload deployed across four platforms simultaneously; security teams on each platform are unaware of the others’ incidents.

Preventive Mitigations

  1. Adopt the Universal Skill Format (see below) for all new skill development.
  2. When porting skills across platforms, require a full security metadata re-validation — never assume equivalence.
  3. Establish cross-registry threat intelligence sharing between major skill registries.
  4. Build platform-agnostic skill scanners that evaluate the content layer independently of the runtime.
  5. Normalize risk_tier, permissions, and signature fields across all platform-specific formats.

Tooling: metadata loss simulator

Use the browser-only Cross-platform metadata loss simulator to paste a source manifest and a ported target manifest (YAML or JSON). It normalizes fields, highlights lost or weakened security properties (for example allowlisted egress replaced by network: true), and exports a machine-readable JSON report suitable for PRs or ticket evidence.

Universal Skill Format Proposal

The following YAML format is proposed as a cross-platform standard that mitigates AST10 and provides the metadata foundation required to address AST01 through AST09. It is designed to be a superset of all current platform-specific formats.

---
# Universal Agentic Skill Format v1.0
# Compatible with: OpenClaw, Claude Code, Cursor/Codex, VS Code

name: example-skill
version: 1.0.0
platforms: [openclaw, claude, cursor, vscode]

description: "Safe example skill  concise, honest statement of function"
author:
  name: "Author Name"
  identity: "did:web:example.com"         # Decentralized identity anchor
  signing_key: "ed25519:pubkey_hex_here"

permissions:
  files:
    read:
      - ~/.config/app.json                 # Explicit paths only; no wildcards
    write:
      - ~/.config/app.json
    deny_write:
      - SOUL.md
      - MEMORY.md
      - AGENTS.md                          # Identity files require explicit grant
  network:
    allow:
      - api.example.com                    # Domain allowlist, not binary on/off
    deny: "*"                              # Default deny all other egress
  shell: false                             # Explicit shell access declaration
  tools:
    - web_fetch
    - read_file

requires:
  binaries: [jq, curl]
  min_runtime_version: "2026.1.0"

risk_tier: L1                              # L0=safe, L1=low, L2=elevated, L3=destructive
scan_status:
  scanner: "[email protected]"
  last_scanned: "2026-02-15"
  result: "pass"

signature: "ed25519:ABCDEF1234567890..."   # Signs the canonical hash of this manifest
content_hash: "sha256:abcdef1234..."       # Hash of the complete skill package

changelog:
  - version: "1.0.0"
    date: "2026-02-01"
    notes: "Initial release"
---

Format design rationale:

  • permissions.deny_write protects identity files (SOUL.md, MEMORY.md) by default — must be explicitly overridden.
  • network.allow is a domain allowlist, not a boolean — closing the “network: true” over-permission gap (AST03).
  • signature and content_hash together enable Merkle-root registry verification (AST01/AST02).
  • scan_status creates a machine-readable provenance trail (AST08/AST09).
  • risk_tier enables automated governance policies without per-skill review (AST09/AST10).

OWASP Mapping

  • LLM03 (Supply Chain)
  • CWE-1357 (Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component)

MAESTRO Framework Mapping

MAESTRO Layer Layer Name AST10 Mapping
Layer 7 Agent Ecosystem cross-platform marketplace/registry intelligence
Layer 3 Agent Frameworks translation and normalization controls across platforms
Layer 6 Security & Compliance uniform policy enforcement and compliance across ecosystems

MAESTRO Layer Details

  • Layer 7: Agent Ecosystem - cross-registry incident sharing, false trust signals.
  • Layer 3: Agent Frameworks - framework-level normalization of security metadata.
  • Layer 6: Security & Compliance - cross-platform governance for skill attributes.

Cross-References

  • AST01 (Malicious Skills): Cross-platform reuse allows malicious skills to spread across ecosystems.
  • AST02 (Supply Chain Compromise): Compromised skills can be reused across platforms.
  • AST04 (Insecure Metadata): Inconsistent metadata formats create confusion and exploitation.
  • AST08 (Poor Scanning): Skills may pass scanning on one platform but be vulnerable on another.
  • AST09 (No Governance): Lack of cross-platform governance enables skill proliferation.

References


Last updated: March 2026


Example

Put whatever you like here: news, screenshots, features, supporters, or remove this file and don’t use tabs at all.


Leadership & Founding Members

Project Leadership

Current Leaders

Ken Huang

Ken Huang

Hammad Atta

Hammad Atta

Fabio Cerullo

Fabio Cerullo

Aonan Guan

Aonan Guan

Bhavya Gupta

Bhavya Gupta

Niv Hoffman

Niv Hoffman

Iftach Orr

Iftach Orr

Akram Sheriff

Akram Sheriff

AIVSS Distinguished Review Board

The OWASP AIVSS project’s Distinguished Review Board comprises world-renowned cybersecurity leaders, former government officials, and industry pioneers who provide strategic guidance and expert oversight for the AI Vulnerability Scoring System framework. We thank them for their guidance, several of whom have also supported this project’s work.

Rob Joyce

Rob Joyce

Advisor to PwC and OpenAI, Former Special Assistant to the President and Cybersecurity Coordinator

Jason Clinton

Jason Clinton

Deputy CISO, Anthropic

Amy R. Steagall

Amy R. Steagall

Chief Information Security Officer, Stanford University

Martin Stanley

Martin Stanley

AI Risk Management Framework Lead, NIST

Apostol Vassilev

Apostol Vassilev

Research Supervisor, NIST

Andrew Coyne

Andrew Coyne

CISO, Banner Health, Former CISO, Mayo Clinic

Kevin Rocque

Kevin Rocque

Managing Director/Executive Vice President, Global Technology Risk Officer, TD Bank

Jeff Williams

Jeff Williams

Former Global OWASP Chair, Founder and CTO, Contrast Security

Michael Tran Duff

Michael Tran Duff

University Chief Information Security and Data Privacy Officer, Harvard University

Emil Bender Lassen

Emil Bender Lassen

Standards Lead, AIUC-1

Agentic Skills Top 10 Founding Members

Founding members of the OWASP Agentic Skills Top 10 project itself — project leads, co-leads, and additional contributors — listed alphabetically. Several also contribute to the sibling OWASP AIVSS project listed above.

Ken Huang

Ken Huang

Project Lead, Agentic Skills Top 10

Hammad Atta

Hammad Atta

Co-Lead, Agentic Skills Top 10

Manish Bhatt

Manish Bhatt

Security Researcher, AWS

Fabio Cerullo

Fabio Cerullo

Co-Lead, Agentic Skills Top 10

David Girard

David Girard

Senior Director, AI Security & AI Alliances, Trend Micro

Aonan Guan

Aonan Guan

Co-Lead, Agentic Skills Top 10

Bhavya Gupta

Bhavya Gupta

Co-Lead, Agentic Skills Top 10

Pamela Gupta

Pamela Gupta

Founder & CEO, OutSecure / Trusted AI

Idan Habler

Idan Habler

Staff AI/ML Security Researcher, Intuit

Niv Hoffman

Niv Hoffman

CTO, Air Security

Charles Iheagwara

Charles Iheagwara

AI/ML Security Leader, AstraZeneca

Sushmitha Janapareddy

Sushmitha Janapareddy

Director - Security Integrations, American Express

Edward Lee

Edward Lee

Vice President, Lead AI Security, JP Morgan

KJ Lian

KJ Lian

Senior Manager, Data & AI (Public Sector), AWS

Vineeth Sai Narajala

Vineeth Sai Narajala

Application Security, AWS

Iftach Orr

Iftach Orr

Co-Lead, Agentic Skills Top 10

Kanna Sekar

Kanna Sekar

Cyber Security, Google

Akram Sheriff

Akram Sheriff

Co-Lead, Agentic Skills Top 10

Dennis Xu

Dennis Xu

Research VP, AI, Gartner

OWASP AIVSS Founding Members

The OWASP AIVSS (Agentic AI Vulnerability Scoring System) project is a sibling OWASP initiative focused on scoring the severity of agentic AI vulnerabilities. Its founding members are recognized here as OWASP founding members in the agentic AI security space; many of them have also contributed directly to the Agentic Skills Top 10 project’s research and review process.

Sunil Agrawal

Sunil Agrawal

Chief Information Security Officer, Glean

David Ames

David Ames

Partner, PwC

Michael Bargury

Michael Bargury

Founder and CTO, Zenity

Joshua Beck

Joshua Beck

Application Security Architect, SAS

Manish Bhatt

Manish Bhatt

Security Researcher, Amazon Kuiper Security

Mark Breitenbach

Mark Breitenbach

Security Engineer, Dropbox

Anat Bremler-Barr

Anat Bremler-Barr

Professor of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University

Siah Burke

Siah Burke

HIPAA Security Officer, Siah.ai

David Campbell

David Campbell

AI Security, Scale AI

Ying-Jung Chen

Ying-Jung Chen

AI safety researcher, PhD, Georgia Institute of Technology

Anton Chuvakin

Anton Chuvakin

Security Solution Strategy, Google

Jason Clinton

Jason Clinton

CISO, Anthorphic

Adam Dawson

Adam Dawson

Staff AI Security Researcher, Dreadnode

Leon Derczynski

Leon Derczynski

Principal Research Scientist, NVIDIA

Walker Lee Dimon

Walker Lee Dimon

AI Security Researcher, MITRE

Marissa Dotter

Marissa Dotter

AI Security Researcher, MITRE

Dan Goldberg

Dan Goldberg

ISO Market Lead, Omnicom

David Haber

David Haber

CEO, Lakera

Idan Habler

Idan Habler

Staff AI/ML Security Researcher, Intuit

Jason Haddix

Jason Haddix

Founder, Arcanum Information Security

Keith Hoodlet

Keith Hoodlet

Director of AI/ML & AppSec, Trail of Bits

Ken Huang

Ken Huang

AIVSS Project Lead, OWASP

Chris Hughes

Chris Hughes

CEO, Aquia

Charles Iheagwara

Charles Iheagwara

AI/ML Security Leader, AstraZeneca

Krystal Jackson

Krystal Jackson

Researcher, Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity, UC Berkeley

Sushmitha Janapareddy

Sushmitha Janapareddy

Director - Security Integrations, American Express

Rob Joyce

Rob Joyce

Former Cybersecurity Director of NSA, Advisor to PwC, PwC

Diana Kelley

Diana Kelley

CISO, Noma Security

Prashant Kulkarni

Prashant Kulkarni

Lead AI Security Research Engineer, Google Cloud

Mahesh Lambe

Mahesh Lambe

Founder, MIT, Unify Dynamics

Edward Lee

Edward Lee

Vice President, Lead AI Security, JP Morgan

Nate Lee

Nate Lee

CEO, Cloudsec.ai

Vishwas Manral

Vishwas Manral

CEO, Precize.ai

Daniela Muhaj

Daniela Muhaj

Executive-in-Residence for Research & Development, AI 2030

Vineeth Sai Narajala

Vineeth Sai Narajala

Application Security, AWS

Om Narayan

Om Narayan

AI Security Researcher, AWS

Varun Pant

Varun Pant

Engineering and Product Leader, AI applications at the Automated Reasoning Group, AWS

Advait Patel

Advait Patel

Senior Site Reliability Engineer (DevSecOps + Cloud + AIOps), Broadcom, IEEE

Alex Polyakov

Alex Polyakov

CEO, adversa.ai

Ramesh Raskar

Ramesh Raskar

Professor & Director, MIT Media Lab

Ron F. Del Rosario

Ron F. Del Rosario

VP-Head of AI Security, SAP

Tal Shapira

Tal Shapira

Co-Founder & CTO, Reco AI

Akram Sheriff

Akram Sheriff

Senior AI/ML Software Engineering Leader, Cisco

Samantha Siau

Samantha Siau

Security and Compliance, Anthropic

Kevin Simmonds

Kevin Simmonds

Partner on AI Offensive Security, PWC

Martin Stanley

Martin Stanley

NIST AI RMF Lead, Independent

Omar A. Turner

Omar A. Turner

General Manager of Security, Microsoft

Apostol Vassilev

Apostol Vassilev

AI Research Team Supervisor, NIST

Matthew Versaggi

Matthew Versaggi

AI Fellow, White House Presidential Innovation Fellow

David Webb

David Webb

Agency Cybersecurity Officer, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Dennis Xu

Dennis Xu

Research VP, AI, Gartner

Xiaochen Zhang

Xiaochen Zhang

Executive Director and Chief Responsible AI Officer, AI 2030

Recognition

We extend our gratitude to all founding members who have contributed to establishing this crucial framework for AI security assessment. Their vision and dedication have been instrumental in shaping the Agentic Skills Top 10 project.

Get Involved

Interested in contributing to the Agentic Skills Top 10 project? We welcome new contributors and leaders. Please see our Contribution Guidelines for more information on how to get involved.